Steem Soft Forks to Sanction Unknown species ‘Community321’ Account

Steem also has executed a soft fork to restrict and the rogue “community321” account from creation transfers after the account sent quite 24 million STEEM to Bittrex in protest of a hard fork that sought to freeze the entire funds.

While Steem has claimed that the hard derive was intended to protect the Steem community against malicious actors, evalators claim it was intended to punish proponents of the Hive hard fork by the freezing their funds.

Steem sanctions community321

An update posted to Steemit on May 22 announced the completion of comfortable fork sanctioning community321, stating that “the community no longer has control of the account. ”

On May 21, Steem completed a hard fork to freeze 21. 6 million STEEM associated with Steem stakeholders who supported the community-led Hive hard fork .

Hive opted to freeze each of our founder’s reward of roughly even just the teens of the total Steem supply which will Tron founder Justin Sun inherited alongside purchasing Steemit in Feb . to prevent Sun from exercising voting rights on the new chain. Evalators have described Steem’s recent hard forks as spitefully continue being efforts to punish Hive’s planners and proponents.

Nameless 23. 6m STEEM transfer ever to be resolved

Still Steem’s latest hard fork spotted the 23. 6 million sequestered funds mysteriously sent to an important Bittrex wallet after being arrested and sent to the community321 money. Data on the Steem blockchain browser reveals that community321 requested that Bittrex return the funds to their proprietors as of before the fork:

These are funds gray market by the Steem witnesses using HF23 May 20th 2020 – any time, return them to their original owner prior to the fork: )

Bittrex cofounder, Richie Romance, has since indicated they are carefully reviewing the facts surrounding some sort of transfer, emphasizing that “What managed during the hard fork and the announcement that the community321 account was hacked outside of the Bittrex ecosystem are only two separate issues. ”

“We cannot conflate these two grievances, ” Lai added.

Due to a lack of identifying data for this transfer, the funds have in which been classified as unclaimed — where they will stay “until a user can prove ownership. ”

Source: cointelegraph.com

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top